|
2006 Teams Review
An in-depth look at the past season, team by team and driver by driver |
||||
| Back to 2006 Season Review | Back to Reject CENTRALE | Go to Text-Only Version | ||
|
||||
| 1. Renault | ||||||
|
||||||
|
The French manufacturer may not have been able to control the championship as they did last year, but in a way that made their second straight double-title more impressive. For all the appearance of continuity, there was enough that could have gone wrong. The R26 was new, even if an evolution of the successful R25. The team had to ditch their title-winning engine for a V8. Michelin was less enthusiastic than in previous years. And they raced the whole year knowing Fernando Alonso was leaving at the end of it.
A rampant first half of the season showed that despite all this, they remained the team to beat. Even in the second half, when Ferrari threw the kitchen sink at the them, and officialdom seemed to collude against them, they never wavered and took their eyes of maximising every opportunity. The team honourably backed Alonso to the very end. Their tactical ingenuity often surpassed Ferrari's, most notably in France, and Flavio Briatore remained the most consummate politician in pit lane.
The facts in the end speak for themselves. Alonso and the team recorded the same number of victories as the year before, although this year featured one fewer race. Both Alonso and Giancarlo Fisichella outscored their tally from 2005. The team didn't get the best out of Fisichella, but that's not necessarily their fault. There were only 3 race mechanical failures, and 32 points finishes from 36. It was a near-perfect year in terms of championship-winning consistency, even if they weren't always the fastest car.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 2. Ferrari | ||||||
|
||||||
|
After the woes of 2005, Jean Todt unveiled the new 248 F1 saying that Ferrari were going into this year "with great humility". At the time we couldn't be sure, but in hindsight we now know that that was code for saying that they were hungry and poised for a fightback. The two major problems with last year's package, chassis and tyres, were solved. The new car proved easy on the eye and easy in the hands of the pilot, and the return of tyre changes allowed Bridgestone to return to they tried and trusted best.
For some moments in the first half of the season, and for most of the second half, the Ferrari was the car to beat. What they couldn't emulate, however, was the ruthlessness of pre-2005 Ferrari. That mantle had gone to their rivals Renault. For two-thirds of the year Felipe Massa could not provide enough support and had too many wild moments. Michael Schumacher still made his occasional mistakes, and the team didn't handle the Monaco debacle and Schumi's retirement speculation in the most elegant way.
But it was on two fronts in particular that Ferrari lost ground. One was engine reliability with the new V8, with problems in Malaysia and most notably Japan proving costly. The other was in terms of strategy. The team's lack of intervention in Malaysia, Hungary and Turkey, whilst laudable from a sporting perspective, cost Schumacher valuable points. In the end, it was a fine rebound and a worthy sign-off year for Schumacher, Ross Brawn and Paolo Martinelli, but being pipped for both titles was not the dream finale.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 3. BMW Sauber | ||||||
|
||||||
|
We all thought this would be a getting-to-know-you year, as the folk at Hinwil got diluted by the influx from Munich. But they hit the ground running and never looked back. The F1.06 and the BMW engine made for a neat, compact package that seemed easy to handle, Nick Heidfeld revelled in being a team leader, and even the unloved (even by team management) Jacques Villeneuve found his mojo again. Heidfeld qualified in the top 10 in Bahrain, Villeneuve scored in Malaysia, and they both scored in Melbourne.
Previously, Sauber's greatest bugbear was that they would have a competitive chassis early in the season, but there would be no development as the year wore on. With BMW ownership and cash, that was no longer a problem. Although there were some off-colour weekends, like San Marino, Monaco and Germany, usually they were on the fringes of the top 10 in qualifying and in the hunt for the minor points. 19 times out of 36 attempts they participated in the third segment of qualifying, and they finished with 36 points.
Most impressive, though, was their last third of the season. They had been in the hunt for Friday honours all year, first with Robert Kubica and then with Sebastian Vettel, but when the opportunity came to finally dispatch Villeneuve, Kubica stepped up to the plate in spectacular fashion. It rejuvenated Heidfeld and the rest of the team, and despite the speed not always being backed up by results, like in Turkey and Brazil, on pace alone they were giving the likes of McLaren, Honda and Toyota some real headaches.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 4. Super Aguri / Honda | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Now this ranking of fourth might come as a surprise, and it's true that Super Aguri achieved nothing like what, say, Jordan, Sauber and Stewart did in their debut years - in fact, on the scoresheet, they scored nothing at all. But bear in mind that twelve months ago, Super Aguri as an F1 team was only a concept. There was the Honda engine deal for keeping Takuma Sato in F1, a factory, the ability to use four-year-old Arrows chassis, and, um, nothing else except huge slabs of optimism and determination.
They made it to Bahrain with two cars, and got Sato to the finish. By Australia, Taku ran the first part of the race in the midfield, ahead of Barrichello in the works Honda. Super Aguri were a constant work in progress, putting new parts on the cars at every race, and even bringing out a new car for the last seven races of the year. It culminated in that amazing Brazilian GP, when they came 7th and 9th in the fastest lap standings, and Sato finished 10th ahead of Red Bulls, Toro Rossos and Spyker MF1s.
Sure, the team had their fair share of mechanical difficulties as well as scrapes and bingles. Sure, at one stage it was rumoured that Aguri Suzuki and managing director Daniele Audetto were not on good terms, but that seemed to be resolved. Sure, they had trouble in the second car with on Franck Montagny shining but Yuji Ide and Sakon Yamamoto struggling. But in twelve months, they had gained the entire pit lane's respect, and they had taken over from Minardi as everyone's second-favourite team.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 5. Honda | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Honda's publicity machine always seems to be slightly out of sync with reality. After promising the world and flunking in 2005, they declared that their sole aim in their new guise as purely Honda was to win a race this year. Pre-season times suggested that they would achieve that target, and perhaps even give the titles a shake. But when reality showed that they were off the pace of the Renaults and Ferraris, they kept claiming that they had a chance race after race, even when it was patently clear that they did not.
The win of course did finally come in the odd circumstances of Budapest. Mission accomplished, right? Look past the sound-bytes, though, and surely this could not be a serious team if they didn't have championship intent. And from that point of view 2006 was a bit disappointing. From early in the season, they were in 4th in the constructors points, unchallenged from behind and unable to challenge McLaren ahead, let alone Renault and Ferrari. In short, there was no escaping that they were only fourth best.
On the up-side, there seemed to be real cohesion between Nick Fry and Gil de Ferran's leadership, Geoff Willis' technical expertise, and Jenson Button as the undisputed lead driver. Apart from the odd wonky round mid-season, most notably in France, the RA106 package was a consistent points-scorer, and a nice step forward. But they couldn't stroke the best out of Rubens Barrichello all season, and their overall position in the field was below what we know their expectations really are. Whatever the spin-doctors say.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 6. McLaren / Mercedes | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Can one man really make that much of a difference? Adrian Newey laid the groundwork for the MP4-21, and left for Red Bull. Mike Coughlan and co were left with the task of refining this year's car into a bullet, and, frankly, didn't. After having the quickest car of last season, for much of this year McLaren were a lonely 3rd in the constructors' title, and justifiably so. Here was a regular points and podium-scoring machine, but not a race-winning one. Chassis, aerodynamics and engine were simply not quite on the money.
Only really in Monaco, Canada, Italy and China did the car show anything like winning pace. Some will look at the team's finishing record and think that reliability was once again poor. However, Kimi Raikkonen only suffered two race mechanical failures (albeit at Monaco and Shanghai when he was in real contention), and the other car only had three between Juan-Pablo Montoya and Pedro de la Rosa. Trouble was, eight DNFs were caused by either collisions or crashes.
Strategically, the team never found a happy medium. They started the year running heavy fuel loads and conservative tactics that compromised track position. Later in the year, Raikkonen was taking poles but on unsustainably lightish fuel loads. Montoya's mid-season departure was a distraction, but must surely have also been partly caused by the early signing of Alonso for 2007 and all that that said about McLaren's faith in JPM. It was McLaren's first winless year since 1996, and that was unsatisfying.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 7. Toro Rosso / Cosworth | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Even if the character of Minardi had disappeared, and no one really seriously believed that this was a true continuation of the Faenza squad (although they were still based there), there was still quite a bit of style at Scuderia Toro Rosso. Apart from the exotic name, they had the most daring paint job seen in many a year, they had the coolest driver in the field in Vitantonio Liuzzi, and they also had the most aptly named in Scott Speed. But did the substance match the style?
It depended on which way you looked at it. With the injection of cash and virtually last year's Red Bull chassis, they were further up the field than where Minardi had been. At some races, like Australia, America, and several races at the end of the year, they were on level terms with the senior team. But the rev-limited V10 gave them little or no advantage regardless of the noises MF1 made, and development on the chassis and the engine was limited as the year went on.
Overall, a solitary point from the race of attrition at Indianapolis was probably less than what they hoped for. Nevertheless, Franz Tost and Gerhard Berger ran a tight and respectable operation, but one wonders if they could have done more to nurture their two drivers. Both have talent and pace to some degree, but both made too many errors all season, and it felt like these rough diamonds weren't being smoothed. It all made for an ongoing B-team feel, that this was a squad of apprentices, discards and off-cuts.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 8. Toyota | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Oh dear. From a results-per-dollar perspective, Toyota are the biggest money-wasters in F1. From 88 points in 2005 to just 35 this year was a massive fall. They launched the TF106 earlier than anyone else, such that by the time Bahrain came around, the car had been substantially upgraded. But a dismally slow showing there put the writing on the wall. The rebound was fairly rapid - Ralf Schumacher scored the team's only podium of the year two races later in Australia - but Mike Gascoyne was sacked anyway.
His replacement by Pascal Vasselon seemed to be a political appointment. In Formula One, building momentum is an important factor, and Toyota have had more managerial and technical upheaval since they entered the sport five seasons ago than just about any other team. And therein lies the problem. The money is there, the pressure from head office in Tokyo is there, but inspiration is in short supply. It was reflected in the rather faceless years that both Ralf and Jarno Trulli had on the track.
Through a combination of incidents and mechanical problems, Trulli could chain no more than three finishes in a row, Schumacher no more than four. For the majority of the season they qualified in and around the top 10, but as a general trend when they started well they dropped back, and when they started further down they could charge into the points. They didn't seem to understand the Bridgestone tyres that they had switched to either. All told, a directionless season for a seemingly directionless (but filthy rich) team.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 9. MF1 / Toyota | ||||||
|
||||||
|
In F1 Racing's season preview, Renault's Pat Symonds was none-too-complimentary about the merit of MF1 in the sport: "I see nothing in them that has any passion ... [a]s a team, they do nothing to enhance Formula 1." Harsh, very harsh, but there was a modicum of truth nonetheless. In their first season racing under their own identity, they fronted up with a colour scheme that, from front-on at least, made them look like a poor man's McLaren, with a performance level to match, despite having Toyota engines.
It was difficult to see where they were heading. At first they comfortably gapped Super Aguri, as they should have done, but by year's end the Japanese upstarts had caught up. Only 8 times all season did they appear in segment two of qualifying, and only at Indy did both cars make it. Reliability was also comparatively poor. Although occasionally Christijan Albers in particular could dice with the Toro Rossos and Red Bulls, MF1's season was spent going nowhere, and not getting there particularly quickly either.
They used five different Friday drivers, whose main purpose was to bring money rather than develop the car. Despite his fatuous denials, speculation all year was rife that Alex Shnaider was going to sell, confirming that F1 had simply been an expensive frolic. The eventual sale to boutique Dutch sports car marque Spyker thus came as no surprise. There can be something very charming about backmarker teams, but that often stems from the team owner's passion for racing. Symonds was probably right to say that MF1's bosses had rather little.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 10. Red Bull / Ferrari | ||||||
|
||||||
|
You'd think that Ferrari engines would be to die for, but in the pre-season Red Bull were disappointed when the Maranello motors simply wouldn't gel with the RB02 chassis, in particular causing major cooling problems. A quick fix was required, but that distraction put them behind the eight-ball. Seven retirements in the first five rounds, through a combination of collisions and mechanical failures, marked such a patchy start that Christian Horner and star recruit Adrian Newey were quickly looking to 2007 already.
It's debatable how much Newey could have done with this year's car, being one he didn't design. But the point is that, although the team's season steadied, with the highlight being Monaco where Christian Klien should have, and David Coulthard did record the their first podium, from about that point on they simply meandered until the end of the year, with hardly any investment in developing the car. In the tail-end of the season, they were battling with the Toro Rossos, and that simply should not have been.
Coulthard especially was able to sneak the occasional respectable result, but Red Bull only made it into the third segment of qualifying five times all season. Their apathy flowed through to the drivers, with neither DC, Klien, or Robert Doornbos late in the year inspired to do their best. Their anonymity at most events was startling, and that in itself was frustrating, especially after some giant-killing performances last year. As fans we love to see teams giving their all, all the time, and Red Bull simply wasn't doing that.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 11. Williams / Cosworth | ||||||
|
||||||
|
If the season had started in January and had opened at Monza, Williams might have had a chance. The FW28 chassis looked neat, but most impressive early on was the powerful Cosworth engine, created on a near-shoestring budget. Williams' showing in Bahrain, when they played it safe yet still finished 6th and 7th with the fastest lap of the race for rookie Nico Rosberg, followed by filling the second row of the grid in Malaysia, suggested that they could make hay while the sun shone and surprise their rivals in the paddock.
The double-retirement at Sepang in the early laps, though, signalled the beginning of a disaster. It went endlessly downhill from there, with atrocious reliability. Hydraulics, engines, gearboxes, exhausts, throttles, tyres, halfshafts and electrics all failed during races, while five collisions and other driving errors added to the DNF litany. The trouble was, different problems were appearing each race, and often they struck whilst the cars were in very competitive positions, for example in Australia, Monaco and Germany.
Their 10-race drought without a point was their worst ever, as was 8th place overall with only 11 points. Under the pre-2003 points system, they would have only scored 2 points! By year's end, Alex Wurz's Friday testing efforts made little impact, relations with Mark Webber had soured, and the cars were no longer competitive as a lack of aero grip could not be resolved, despite backroom shuffling. Having returned to privateer status, we knew that development would be a problem, but we didn't expect things to be this bad.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Some images used here are Copyright © Formula1.com and © F1Racing.net. For enlarged versions, please visit their sites! |
||||||
| |||
| Back to 2006 Season Review | |||
| Main Page | Drivers Index | Reject Teams | Hall of Shame | |||
|
Reject Extras Reject Interviews Submit-a-Reject FAQ / Copyright |
Reject CENTRALE Latest GP Review Other Articles Links / Banner |
Sign Guestbook Read Guestbook Current Poll Previous Polls |
|
|
|
|||
| All original content Copyright © 1999-2006 Formula One Rejects. | |||