Reject (or not) track design.

The place for anything and everything else to do with F1 history, different forms of motorsport, and all other randomness

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby JeremyMcClean » 02 Jul 2012, 07:55

Captain Hammer wrote:A few ideas in London, based on Bernie Ecclestone's comments that he would happily fund a race around the landmarks:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5534141


I like the second one, actually. Though it's a bit long.
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.

Trulli bad puns...
#TakiToFerrari
User avatar
JeremyMcClean
 
Posts: 3831
Joined: 23 Aug 2010, 04:58
Location: Nowhere in particular

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby AndreaModa » 02 Jul 2012, 08:32

Warren Hughes wrote:
AndreaModa wrote:Anyone aware of the brilliant Coventry Ring Road? It would make a fantastic race track, completely free of at-grade intersections except a single roundabout, the rest is free-flowing with the junctions either above or below the road. Therefore I propose the Godiva 500, a 500 mile race named after Lady Godiva the one of the city's most famous icons.

Here is the route: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5529305

And for those unfamiliar with the road itself, here is a 3 minute video showing it in its entirety, starting at the roundabout in the top right in the route map above: http://www.cbrd.co.uk/video/coventryringway.shtml Select the anti-clockwise one, and that's the way I'd envisage the track to run, with the removal of the central barrier so all 4 lanes could be used.

CBRD! And I thought you were cool!

I love that website. And I am not cool.


Haha yes I pay a visit there every so often, there and PM which is another interesting read in that subject field. I'm also on SABRE as well but don't post there very often at all really. :ugeek:
That's right Eddie, that was me with the banner, Spanish GP, 2002. This pile of legal forms won't fill itself in you know...
User avatar
AndreaModa
 
Posts: 3805
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 03:51
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Captain Hammer » 03 Jul 2012, 10:05

JeremyMcClean wrote:
Captain Hammer wrote:A few ideas in London, based on Bernie Ecclestone's comments that he would happily fund a race around the landmarks:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5534141

I like the second one, actually. Though it's a bit long.

FIA regulations allow for circuits up to 7.5km in length. At 6.25km, that circuit fits the regulations well enough, though it is quite long for a street circuit.

This is probably a much more realistic prospect for a street circuit: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5541097

And this is its older, meaner brother: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5541099

Personally, I think these are some of my best designs.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Are we being slightly silly? It's as exciting as VLADIMIR PUTIN wearing a LIVE BEAR!

BaconLettuceNinja wrote:If there's anything I've learned in this week's competition, it's that I never wish to live in the Shetland Islands. Ever.
User avatar
Captain Hammer
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 21:10

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby JeremyMcClean » 03 Jul 2012, 12:33

I really like the second version. Looks simple yet it's not even close to one of those gastly Tilke-Dromes. Looks great, really! :)
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.

Trulli bad puns...
#TakiToFerrari
User avatar
JeremyMcClean
 
Posts: 3831
Joined: 23 Aug 2010, 04:58
Location: Nowhere in particular

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Captain Hammer » 03 Jul 2012, 17:51

I think the short version is better, myself. I could see it being built in the middle of the countryside. However, I'm not keen on the right-angled bend at the two-kilometre mark. Instead, I'd change it to be like "Trafalgar" on the Santander proposal, only made to be a right-left combination instead of a left-right. And, of course, no arch narrowing the circuit.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Are we being slightly silly? It's as exciting as VLADIMIR PUTIN wearing a LIVE BEAR!

BaconLettuceNinja wrote:If there's anything I've learned in this week's competition, it's that I never wish to live in the Shetland Islands. Ever.
User avatar
Captain Hammer
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 21:10

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Sullivangate » 04 Jul 2012, 15:46

I legit tried to do this. But I couldn't get the thing to bathplug work properly. Just does a random course.
Sullivangate
 
Posts: 83
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 14:47

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Sullivangate » 04 Jul 2012, 15:53

Actually it seems to just have an issue with SFO. So that's weird.
Sullivangate
 
Posts: 83
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 14:47

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Sullivangate » 04 Jul 2012, 16:15

Here we go. Las Vegas. Fun times.

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5543116
Sullivangate
 
Posts: 83
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 14:47

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Captain Hammer » 04 Jul 2012, 17:28

Sullivangate wrote:I legit tried to do this. But I couldn't get the thing to bathplug work properly. Just does a random course.

There are certain rules that dictate how and where you can run the roads. For example, the automated drawing tools won't recognise the thin orange lines that are on- and off-ramps. Sometimes, you will need to use the manual drawing tool to get the job done.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Are we being slightly silly? It's as exciting as VLADIMIR PUTIN wearing a LIVE BEAR!

BaconLettuceNinja wrote:If there's anything I've learned in this week's competition, it's that I never wish to live in the Shetland Islands. Ever.
User avatar
Captain Hammer
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 21:10

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby UgncreativeUsergname » 11 Jul 2012, 07:36

I know you can get that point, Caterham.
User avatar
UgncreativeUsergname
 
Posts: 911
Joined: 26 May 2012, 00:36
Location: United States

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby AndreaModa » 11 Jul 2012, 08:05

I have a rather impressive creation here, which unlike many of the circuits here, actually makes a fantastic course in real life:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5553909

This would be the course for a proposed Three Shires TT, similar to the Isle of Man TT course, and only slightly longer in actual length, the circuit is comprised mostly of rural main roads, with some excellent corners and sections which are brilliant to ride on in real life. I'd love to see this actually happen! At each corner is a town, with Banbury (Oxfordshire) in the south acting as the start/finish, with the actual line along the Hennef Way section, with Daventry (Northamptonshire) in the north-east and Southam (Warwickshire) in the north-west. The track would run anti-clockwise, so Banbury to Daventry to Southam and then back to Banbury.

I'd imagine the average speed on this course would be enormous in a competitive environment, as there are very few tight turns on it, with most of those being roundabouts. The roads are all beautifully flowing and a joy to ride on, and they are a favourite for bikers in the area looking for a good ride. Have to mind those speed cameras though! ;)
That's right Eddie, that was me with the banner, Spanish GP, 2002. This pile of legal forms won't fill itself in you know...
User avatar
AndreaModa
 
Posts: 3805
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 03:51
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby WaffleCat » 11 Jul 2012, 15:40

How about this rather ridiculous proposal for Spa in 1967:
http://theracingline.net/racingcircuits/Belgium/SpaFrancorchamps67p.html
Jocke1 wrote:I'm Brian and so is my wife.


takagi_for_the_win wrote:
darkapprentice77 wrote:What would happen if you put a hard tyre the front-left wheel, a soft tyre on the front-right, an intermediate on the rear-left and a wet tyre on the rear-right?

You'd still have better race pace than the Mercedes'.
User avatar
WaffleCat
 
Posts: 1143
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 23:02
Location: In the storeroom under the staircase to the second level of Cyrstal Jade Restaurant.

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby dr-baker » 12 Jul 2012, 00:04

AndreaModa wrote:I have a rather impressive creation here, which unlike many of the circuits here, actually makes a fantastic course in real life:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5553909

This would be the course for a proposed Three Shires TT, similar to the Isle of Man TT course, and only slightly longer in actual length,

Only slightly longer? It's 9/10ths of a mile longer! (>1km for you crazy non-Anglo-Saxons and Aussies). But of course, in percentage terms, I guess it's not much more. I once timed myself driving round the Manx TT track in normal traffic conditions, it took 61 minutes. How long would this take?
As hardcore as a peach...

West Cliff Results 2015
F1RM WEC: 1st (drivers)/2nd (teams)
F3RWRS: 3rd (drivers)/3rd (teams)
Whoop whoop.
User avatar
dr-baker
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:30
Location: at my laptop

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Shizuka » 12 Jul 2012, 00:35

WaffleCat wrote:How about this rather ridiculous proposal for Spa in 1967:
http://theracingline.net/racingcircuits/Belgium/SpaFrancorchamps67p.html


WHAT IS THAT?!

Thank God this proposal didn't go ahead!!!
Stramala [kostas22] wrote:Giedo van der Garde - We expected crap from him, he has delivered crap so far. Well done on matching our expectations lad.
User avatar
Shizuka
 
Posts: 3222
Joined: 28 Jul 2010, 01:36
Location: Somewhere out there in the vast, nothingness of space...

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby BlindCaveSalamander » 12 Jul 2012, 01:25

WaffleCat wrote:How about this rather ridiculous proposal for Spa in 1967:
http://theracingline.net/racingcircuits/Belgium/SpaFrancorchamps67p.html


But, but... where's Eau Rouge? Where's La Source? Where's anything?
Canon manager for the PMMF... I guess...
KICKBOAT
Shadaza wrote:"I went to buy the HRT Brakes, I couldn't stop myself."
Stramala (mibbit chat) wrote:my god, let's tone down the serious shite and get infected with Voecklerreha, god damn
User avatar
BlindCaveSalamander
 
Posts: 4846
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 06:59
Location: A place.

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby AndreaModa » 12 Jul 2012, 07:05

dr-baker wrote:
AndreaModa wrote:I have a rather impressive creation here, which unlike many of the circuits here, actually makes a fantastic course in real life:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5553909

This would be the course for a proposed Three Shires TT, similar to the Isle of Man TT course, and only slightly longer in actual length,

Only slightly longer? It's 9/10ths of a mile longer! (>1km for you crazy non-Anglo-Saxons and Aussies). But of course, in percentage terms, I guess it's not much more. I once timed myself driving round the Manx TT track in normal traffic conditions, it took 61 minutes. How long would this take?


Probably about a similar length of time, there's quite a few 30mph limits, and it would take bloody hours if you stuck to the rural 50 limits that have been slapped completely unnecessarily on all of those roads! :lol:
That's right Eddie, that was me with the banner, Spanish GP, 2002. This pile of legal forms won't fill itself in you know...
User avatar
AndreaModa
 
Posts: 3805
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 03:51
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby dr-baker » 13 Jul 2012, 23:48

AndreaModa wrote:
dr-baker wrote:
AndreaModa wrote:I have a rather impressive creation here, which unlike many of the circuits here, actually makes a fantastic course in real life:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5553909

This would be the course for a proposed Three Shires TT, similar to the Isle of Man TT course, and only slightly longer in actual length,

Only slightly longer? It's 9/10ths of a mile longer! (>1km for you crazy non-Anglo-Saxons and Aussies). But of course, in percentage terms, I guess it's not much more. I once timed myself driving round the Manx TT track in normal traffic conditions, it took 61 minutes. How long would this take?


Probably about a similar length of time, there's quite a few 30mph limits, and it would take bloody hours if you stuck to the rural 50 limits that have been slapped completely unnecessarily on all of those roads! :lol:

Of course, the wonderful part of the Manx track is that many parts are totally without speed limits! But in normal traffic, over the mountain, many people stick to around 50-odd mph. But it is possible to still hit 80-90 mph in places round the track. Legally. On single-carriageways.
As hardcore as a peach...

West Cliff Results 2015
F1RM WEC: 1st (drivers)/2nd (teams)
F3RWRS: 3rd (drivers)/3rd (teams)
Whoop whoop.
User avatar
dr-baker
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:30
Location: at my laptop

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby UgncreativeUsergname » 24 Jul 2012, 07:22

Using basically every road in the entire country to satisfy the FIA's 3.5-km requirement, I made a very rejectful track for a Grand Prix of Vatican City.
I know you can get that point, Caterham.
User avatar
UgncreativeUsergname
 
Posts: 911
Joined: 26 May 2012, 00:36
Location: United States

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby eurobrun » 26 Jul 2012, 17:36

Wizzie wrote:
Me wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member :P
He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia Eurobrun :lol:
User avatar
eurobrun
 
Posts: 5791
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 18:21
Location: Death > Janoskians

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby nome66 » 17 Aug 2012, 14:50

why not, IndyCar?
Image
like many American motorspotrs fans, i miss the 90's but now all we have is this
I believe in German BARawnda-Tyrrell-Simca
also check these guys out
User avatar
nome66
 
Posts: 1206
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 08:42
Location: Central Marlyland, USA



Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby pi314159 » 22 Aug 2012, 15:47

I just thought I had found a good location for a track near Clermont-Ferrand, but then realized it was a part of the Circuit de Charade.
My alternate Formula One: 1976|1977|1978
User avatar
pi314159
 
Posts: 1649
Joined: 11 Aug 2012, 22:12

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby UgncreativeUsergname » 23 Aug 2012, 06:22

Image
Based upon the perimeter of a small island of a small lake in Tasmania that looked like it'd make a good racetrack to me. I imagine it as built just northwest of Lochiel Drive, Miena, Tasmania.
I know you can get that point, Caterham.
User avatar
UgncreativeUsergname
 
Posts: 911
Joined: 26 May 2012, 00:36
Location: United States

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Aerond » 23 Aug 2012, 09:09

This is my London proposal; a bit long but maybe possible and using many of central London landmarks: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5626352
„Thank you Mark, but Mateschitz is in another castle!“ - Marko
Aerond
 
Posts: 2518
Joined: 26 Mar 2010, 05:26

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby dinizintheoven » 01 Sep 2012, 09:14

I found an interesting segment of road earlier between Tijuana and Mexicali. I give you: Mexico's answer to the Nürburgring!
Join the campaign to bring to the world of F1 Rejects racing, the unpleasant log laid by British Leyland after communism crept, like an itchy red blanket, over the shop floor. MORRIS MARINA FOR THE REECCS!
User avatar
dinizintheoven
 
Posts: 2107
Joined: 09 Dec 2010, 11:24

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby JeremyMcClean » 01 Sep 2012, 10:18

dinizintheoven wrote:I found an interesting segment of road earlier between Tijuana and Mexicali. I give you: Mexico's answer to the Nürburgring!


A bit long, at 43km...
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.

Trulli bad puns...
#TakiToFerrari
User avatar
JeremyMcClean
 
Posts: 3831
Joined: 23 Aug 2010, 04:58
Location: Nowhere in particular

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby dr-baker » 01 Sep 2012, 20:22

JeremyMcClean wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:I found an interesting segment of road earlier between Tijuana and Mexicali. I give you: Mexico's answer to the Nürburgring!


A bit long, at 43km...

It's 10.75 miles shorter than the Manx TT Mountain course...
As hardcore as a peach...

West Cliff Results 2015
F1RM WEC: 1st (drivers)/2nd (teams)
F3RWRS: 3rd (drivers)/3rd (teams)
Whoop whoop.
User avatar
dr-baker
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:30
Location: at my laptop

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby roblomas52 » 17 Sep 2012, 07:16

I think I can do Malta as well

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5479097
CoopsII wrote:
Stramala wrote:Except Scotland?! RACISTS!

Look, you guys want your independance well there you are. Bugger off and find your own F1 coverage.
User avatar
roblomas52
 
Posts: 728
Joined: 17 Sep 2012, 02:42
Location: Whadia

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby roblomas52 » 18 Sep 2012, 04:29

some designs for montjuich park in barcalona
proposal 1
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5653255
proposal 2
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com?r=5669263
proposal 3
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com?r=5669325


hope u lot enjoy l.o.l
p.s i'm ready for the next design challange!! :)
CoopsII wrote:
Stramala wrote:Except Scotland?! RACISTS!

Look, you guys want your independance well there you are. Bugger off and find your own F1 coverage.
User avatar
roblomas52
 
Posts: 728
Joined: 17 Sep 2012, 02:42
Location: Whadia

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby roblomas52 » 18 Sep 2012, 04:42

CoopsII wrote:
Stramala wrote:Except Scotland?! RACISTS!

Look, you guys want your independance well there you are. Bugger off and find your own F1 coverage.
User avatar
roblomas52
 
Posts: 728
Joined: 17 Sep 2012, 02:42
Location: Whadia

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Captain Hammer » 24 Sep 2012, 10:05

CarlosFerreira wrote:Are we being slightly silly? It's as exciting as VLADIMIR PUTIN wearing a LIVE BEAR!

BaconLettuceNinja wrote:If there's anything I've learned in this week's competition, it's that I never wish to live in the Shetland Islands. Ever.
User avatar
Captain Hammer
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 21:10

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby UgncreativeUsergname » 24 Sep 2012, 12:40

Captain Hammer wrote:Singapore:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=5677005

They should have you designing everything instead of Tilke.
I know you can get that point, Caterham.
User avatar
UgncreativeUsergname
 
Posts: 911
Joined: 26 May 2012, 00:36
Location: United States

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Captain Hammer » 24 Sep 2012, 15:50

Thank you, but I think you'll find that Tilke didn't actually design Singapore. He made the basic layout, which was changed by a consultancy group based in Singapore. In fact, I think the original circuit design by Tilke was something like this.

Anyway, I've heard talk that the Singaporeans want to cut out the section around the cricket club next year. But if they do that, they're going to be cutting about 1.5km of the circuit, which they realy need, because if they remove it, then the circuit will be too short under the FIA regulations that dictate the minimum length of a circuit. Furthermore, they'd have to get rid of the chicanes along the waterfront, which will further cut down the circuit length. So I have no idea what they could do.

I've also heard that they want to move part of the circuit out to the Marina Bay Sands hotel, which is across the harbour to the south of the circuit. But if they want to keep the current pit facilities, their hands are even further tied, because there is no easy way down there and back. At the very least, they would have to build an entirely new bridge to get the cars out there, because the alternative is shutting down half a highway.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Are we being slightly silly? It's as exciting as VLADIMIR PUTIN wearing a LIVE BEAR!

BaconLettuceNinja wrote:If there's anything I've learned in this week's competition, it's that I never wish to live in the Shetland Islands. Ever.
User avatar
Captain Hammer
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 21:10

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby roblomas52 » 24 Sep 2012, 20:19

Captain Hammer wrote:Thank you, but I think you'll find that Tilke didn't actually design Singapore. He made the basic layout, which was changed by a consultancy group based in Singapore. In fact, I think the original circuit design by Tilke was something like this.

Anyway, I've heard talk that the Singaporeans want to cut out the section around the cricket club next year. But if they do that, they're going to be cutting about 1.5km of the circuit, which they realy need, because if they remove it, then the circuit will be too short under the FIA regulations that dictate the minimum length of a circuit. Furthermore, they'd have to get rid of the chicanes along the waterfront, which will further cut down the circuit length. So I have no idea what they could do.

I've also heard that they want to move part of the circuit out to the Marina Bay Sands hotel, which is across the harbour to the south of the circuit. But if they want to keep the current pit facilities, their hands are even further tied, because there is no easy way down there and back. At the very least, they would have to build an entirely new bridge to get the cars out there, because the alternative is shutting down half a highway.


monaco is 3.3km and nobody complains about it do they :?
CoopsII wrote:
Stramala wrote:Except Scotland?! RACISTS!

Look, you guys want your independance well there you are. Bugger off and find your own F1 coverage.
User avatar
roblomas52
 
Posts: 728
Joined: 17 Sep 2012, 02:42
Location: Whadia

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby eurobrun » 24 Sep 2012, 20:26

roblomas52 wrote:
Captain Hammer wrote:Thank you, but I think you'll find that Tilke didn't actually design Singapore. He made the basic layout, which was changed by a consultancy group based in Singapore. In fact, I think the original circuit design by Tilke was something like this.

Anyway, I've heard talk that the Singaporeans want to cut out the section around the cricket club next year. But if they do that, they're going to be cutting about 1.5km of the circuit, which they realy need, because if they remove it, then the circuit will be too short under the FIA regulations that dictate the minimum length of a circuit. Furthermore, they'd have to get rid of the chicanes along the waterfront, which will further cut down the circuit length. So I have no idea what they could do.

I've also heard that they want to move part of the circuit out to the Marina Bay Sands hotel, which is across the harbour to the south of the circuit. But if they want to keep the current pit facilities, their hands are even further tied, because there is no easy way down there and back. At the very least, they would have to build an entirely new bridge to get the cars out there, because the alternative is shutting down half a highway.


monaco is 3.3km and nobody complains about it do they :?


Monaco has a lot of history
Wizzie wrote:
Me wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member :P
He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia Eurobrun :lol:
User avatar
eurobrun
 
Posts: 5791
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 18:21
Location: Death > Janoskians

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby giraurd » 24 Sep 2012, 23:33

I believe this http://www.grandprix.com/gif/singapore-track.gif was Tilke's original plan for the track, it was clockwise unlike the chosen version.
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:
Shizuka wrote:
GwilymJJames wrote:Sutil and Bianchi will both do a day for Force India at Barcelona.

I sense a shootout between the two.

And then they pick Karthikeyan.
User avatar
giraurd
 
Posts: 195
Joined: 01 Jun 2012, 05:43

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby BlindCaveSalamander » 24 Sep 2012, 23:34

giraurd wrote:I believe this http://www.grandprix.com/gif/singapore-track.gif was Tilke's original plan for the track, it was clockwise unlike the chosen version.


That looks pretty good - except for the roundabout. Roundabouts on street circuits are a VERY BAD IDEA.
Canon manager for the PMMF... I guess...
KICKBOAT
Shadaza wrote:"I went to buy the HRT Brakes, I couldn't stop myself."
Stramala (mibbit chat) wrote:my god, let's tone down the serious shite and get infected with Voecklerreha, god damn
User avatar
BlindCaveSalamander
 
Posts: 4846
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 06:59
Location: A place.

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby Captain Hammer » 25 Sep 2012, 09:14

While it's a roundabout, it's actually quite a big one - its perimeter is about 300m. Compare that to most of the ones you see on suburban streets, which usually have a perimeter of less than ten metres.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Are we being slightly silly? It's as exciting as VLADIMIR PUTIN wearing a LIVE BEAR!

BaconLettuceNinja wrote:If there's anything I've learned in this week's competition, it's that I never wish to live in the Shetland Islands. Ever.
User avatar
Captain Hammer
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 21:10

Re: Reject (or not) track design.

Postby BlindCaveSalamander » 25 Sep 2012, 11:27

Captain Hammer wrote:While it's a roundabout, it's actually quite a big one - its perimeter is about 300m. Compare that to most of the ones you see on suburban streets, which usually have a perimeter of less than ten metres.


Still a bad idea though - there's really only one entrance and exit to a roundabout when you're racing. Any attempt at an overtake will be... messy.
Canon manager for the PMMF... I guess...
KICKBOAT
Shadaza wrote:"I went to buy the HRT Brakes, I couldn't stop myself."
Stramala (mibbit chat) wrote:my god, let's tone down the serious shite and get infected with Voecklerreha, god damn
User avatar
BlindCaveSalamander
 
Posts: 4846
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 06:59
Location: A place.

PreviousNext

Return to The Eric van de Poele Memorial Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], RealRacingRoots and 4 guests