2015 RoLFS: Aston 24H: RACE RESULTS UP

Archive for the three above subforums

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Wizzie » 05 Jun 2012, 08:02

Three days ago, MRT were the oly new entry and looking fairly safe for qualifying for the majority of the races. And then THIS happens :|
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
User avatar
Wizzie
 
Posts: 11850
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 14:42
Location: The OTHER edge of the hole that is Penrith

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 05 Jun 2012, 08:17

Vepe wrote:Great!

So lets make this official:

Entrant: De Friis Motorsport (NED)
Cars:
#29 Karl van der Zwaart (NED)
#30 Helio Hernandez (MEX)

Engine: Judd badged as Citroen

Liveries coming later

All good, except your numbers are 28 and 29, and the engine situation is still not entirely clear so you'll have to wait with that (but in any case you'll get to keep the Citroën name on, though). Also remember to choose your tyres, at the moment Pirelli and Dunlop have still got slots left.

With this addition, the non-qualification compensations are now 6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14, which is still subject to change. Also, the absolute, unchanging entry limit is 30 cars. So there's only one car slot left.

Wizzie wrote:Three days ago, MRT were the oly new entry and looking fairly safe for qualifying for the majority of the races. And then THIS happens :|

I'm pretty surprised at the recent amount of entries as well. However, they're now limited, as I don't want to see the same as what is in F1RWRS at the moment (with many teams constantly failing to qualify). Also, I've got a plan in mind which may see entrants failing to qualify for the feature race having the chance to take part in the sprint race.
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Ataxia » 05 Jun 2012, 08:25

Wizzie wrote:Three days ago, MRT were the oly new entry and looking fairly safe for qualifying for the majority of the races. And then THIS happens :|


Don't worry Wizzie, I'll be amazed if my entry manages to qualify :lol:
F1RDS - Bringing fresh blood to RWRS since 2015.

F1 Rejects' resident grump/grouch.
User avatar
Ataxia
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: 23 Jun 2010, 22:47
Location: Breathing in the chemicals (AHHHH!)

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Stramala » 05 Jun 2012, 08:38

Or you could change to a Rallycross format :)
I O . S O N O . I N T E R I S T A
2015 INDYCAR CHAMPION
2015 REJECTS OF LFS DRIVER & TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 F2RWRS TEAMS & MANUFACTURERS CHAMPION
2015 F1RMGP WEC TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 SUPER TOURING CUP CHAMPION
User avatar
Stramala
 
Posts: 8706
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 19:30

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 05 Jun 2012, 08:58

Well, here's my idea for the revised sprint race format. Currently, all a car needs to do to qualify for the sprint race is to get over 90% of the distance of the winner. If there are disqualifications or retirements before that limit, then there will simply be less cars competing. However under the revised system, those who fail to get over the 90% distance would have to drive against the 9 non-qualified cars in a special qualifying session. The fastest cars from this session would then be put at the back of the sprint race grid. While it may seem that they've got little chance of getting anything out of it, the carnage which will no doubt now take place with the faster cars gives them a chance to get a good position or even score points despite missing the feature race.

For example, we have a race where 4 cars fail to complete the 90% limit, plus one that is disqualified. The disqualified driver cannot take part in the sprint race, so that leaves 5 grid slots for the sprint race. The four under-90% drivers now have to battle against the 9 who failed to qualify, and 5 of the fastest drivers of this special qualifying session get into the sprint race - the fastest gets the 16th grid spot, followed by 17th, 18th, 19th, the 5th best getting 20th. All others fail to qualify. So there's a chance that those who failed to qualify for the feature race may still sneak into the sprint race. Does this sound good?
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Ataxia » 05 Jun 2012, 09:07

Nuppiz wrote:Well, here's my idea for the revised sprint race format. Currently, all a car needs to do to qualify for the sprint race is to get over 90% of the distance of the winner. If there are disqualifications or retirements before that limit, then there will simply be less cars competing. However under the revised system, those who fail to get over the 90% distance would have to drive against the 9 non-qualified cars in a special qualifying session. The fastest cars from this session would then be put at the back of the sprint race grid. While it may seem that they've got little chance of getting anything out of it, the carnage which will no doubt now take place with the faster cars gives them a chance to get a good position or even score points despite missing the feature race.

For example, we have a race where 4 cars fail to complete the 90% limit, plus one that is disqualified. The disqualified driver cannot take part in the sprint race, so that leaves 5 grid slots for the sprint race. The four under-90% drivers now have to battle against the 9 who failed to qualify, and 5 of the fastest drivers of this special qualifying session get into the sprint race - the fastest gets the 16th grid spot, followed by 17th, 18th, 19th, the 5th best getting 20th. All others fail to qualify. So there's a chance that those who failed to qualify for the feature race may still sneak into the sprint race. Does this sound good?


Like it. Definitely spices things up for the sprint race.
F1RDS - Bringing fresh blood to RWRS since 2015.

F1 Rejects' resident grump/grouch.
User avatar
Ataxia
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: 23 Jun 2010, 22:47
Location: Breathing in the chemicals (AHHHH!)

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby eurobrun » 05 Jun 2012, 09:10

Sounds like a good idea.
Wizzie wrote:
Me wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member :P
He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia Eurobrun :lol:
User avatar
eurobrun
 
Posts: 5803
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 18:21
Location: Death > Janoskians

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Vepe » 05 Jun 2012, 09:11

Nuppiz wrote:
Vepe wrote:Great!

So lets make this official:

Entrant: De Friis Motorsport (NED)
Cars:
#29 Karl van der Zwaart (NED)
#30 Helio Hernandez (MEX)

Engine: Judd badged as Citroen

Liveries coming later

All good, except your numbers are 28 and 29, and the engine situation is still not entirely clear so you'll have to wait with that (but in any case you'll get to keep the Citroën name on, though). Also remember to choose your tyres, at the moment Pirelli and Dunlop have still got slots left.


This clear.
I´ll take Dunlops.
Vepe
 
Posts: 298
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 03:18
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Stramala » 05 Jun 2012, 09:14

Can I offer another suggestion.

There is a qualifying session followed by three races. All cars, 1st to 30th, get a qualifying position. At this point, there are two seperate races, Heat A and Heat B. 1st overall in qualifying starts on pole in Heat A, 2nd in quali starts on pole in Heat B. 3rd overall is second in Heat A, 4th overall is second in Heat B, and so on.

The Heat races are short, and only award minor points (1st-4th, 5-3-2-1). Out of the 15 cars in each heat, 5 are eliminated, leaving the 10 best from each to combine in the Final, where bigger points are handed out (1st-10th, you decide).

It gives a chance for cars which were unfairly blocked in quali or just plain sucked to make up some positions and race in the final, and also gives the perennial backmarkers some actual race time as well.
I O . S O N O . I N T E R I S T A
2015 INDYCAR CHAMPION
2015 REJECTS OF LFS DRIVER & TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 F2RWRS TEAMS & MANUFACTURERS CHAMPION
2015 F1RMGP WEC TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 SUPER TOURING CUP CHAMPION
User avatar
Stramala
 
Posts: 8706
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 19:30

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 05 Jun 2012, 09:18

kostas22 wrote:Can I offer another suggestion.

There is a qualifying session followed by three races. All cars, 1st to 30th, get a qualifying position. At this point, there are two seperate races, Heat A and Heat B. 1st overall in qualifying starts on pole in Heat A, 2nd in quali starts on pole in Heat B. 3rd overall is second in Heat A, 4th overall is second in Heat B, and so on.

The Heat races are short, and only award minor points (1st-4th, 5-3-2-1). Out of the 15 cars in each heat, 5 are eliminated, leaving the 10 best from each to combine in the Final, where bigger points are handed out (1st-10th, you decide).

It gives a chance for cars which were unfairly blocked in quali or just plain sucked to make up some positions and race in the final, and also gives the perennial backmarkers some actual race time as well.

So, in essence the sprint race would be replaced by two heats. There might be a slight problem if we don't get a 30th entrant (plus it will be painful to make it work in the wiki!). But other than that it sounds quite interesting, so I'm taking it into consideration.
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Wizzie » 05 Jun 2012, 09:30

Nuppiz wrote:
kostas22 wrote:Can I offer another suggestion.

There is a qualifying session followed by three races. All cars, 1st to 30th, get a qualifying position. At this point, there are two seperate races, Heat A and Heat B. 1st overall in qualifying starts on pole in Heat A, 2nd in quali starts on pole in Heat B. 3rd overall is second in Heat A, 4th overall is second in Heat B, and so on.

The Heat races are short, and only award minor points (1st-4th, 5-3-2-1). Out of the 15 cars in each heat, 5 are eliminated, leaving the 10 best from each to combine in the Final, where bigger points are handed out (1st-10th, you decide).

It gives a chance for cars which were unfairly blocked in quali or just plain sucked to make up some positions and race in the final, and also gives the perennial backmarkers some actual race time as well.

So, in essence the sprint race would be replaced by two heats. There might be a slight problem if we don't get a 30th entrant (plus it will be painful to make it work in the wiki!). But other than that it sounds quite interesting, so I'm taking it into consideration.


Let the wiki people who know what their doing (i.e. AndreaModa, Tommy, Tristian, Kostas and Lappy/Myself when we're not too lazy to do anything) sort that out for you.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
User avatar
Wizzie
 
Posts: 11850
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 14:42
Location: The OTHER edge of the hole that is Penrith

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby pasta_maldonado » 06 Jun 2012, 00:32

kostas22 wrote:Can I offer another suggestion.

There is a qualifying session followed by three races. All cars, 1st to 30th, get a qualifying position. At this point, there are two seperate races, Heat A and Heat B. 1st overall in qualifying starts on pole in Heat A, 2nd in quali starts on pole in Heat B. 3rd overall is second in Heat A, 4th overall is second in Heat B, and so on.

The Heat races are short, and only award minor points (1st-4th, 5-3-2-1). Out of the 15 cars in each heat, 5 are eliminated, leaving the 10 best from each to combine in the Final, where bigger points are handed out (1st-10th, you decide).

It gives a chance for cars which were unfairly blocked in quali or just plain sucked to make up some positions and race in the final, and also gives the perennial backmarkers some actual race time as well.


Good idea kostas, but we don't want to turn this into the Champions League or something. Nuppiz, is there any way you can change the number of cars that can start, perhaps to 25? I don't know how similar LFS is to rFactor, but in rFactor there is a line in the track file that governs how many cars can start a race.
Plus One Group - Everyone's favourite motorsports group!

"It's just...you know...basically shite happens" -Juan Pablo Montoya
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
 
Posts: 3686
Joined: 23 Apr 2012, 02:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Stramala » 06 Jun 2012, 00:50

I had a look at the config file myself and couldn't fine any line in the code that allows modification of maximum cars allowed. But perhaps I missed something, maybe there's another file in another file that controls it, I don't know, but certainly in the general game config file there's no option for it.
I O . S O N O . I N T E R I S T A
2015 INDYCAR CHAMPION
2015 REJECTS OF LFS DRIVER & TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 F2RWRS TEAMS & MANUFACTURERS CHAMPION
2015 F1RMGP WEC TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 SUPER TOURING CUP CHAMPION
User avatar
Stramala
 
Posts: 8706
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 19:30

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby pasta_maldonado » 06 Jun 2012, 00:51

kostas22 wrote:I had a look at the config file myself and couldn't fine any line in the code that allows modification of maximum cars allowed. But perhaps I missed something, maybe there's another file in another file that controls it, I don't know, but certainly in the general game config file there's no option for it.


I don't have LFS myself, maybe look in the track files themselves? Or is there a series file?
Plus One Group - Everyone's favourite motorsports group!

"It's just...you know...basically shite happens" -Juan Pablo Montoya
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
 
Posts: 3686
Joined: 23 Apr 2012, 02:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Vepe » 06 Jun 2012, 01:23

defriismotorsport.com wrote:We are happy to announce our line-up for 2015 Rejects of LFS season.
Our driver for the number 28 car is Karl van der Zwaart. After lot of success in junior formulae, incliding first place in Finnish F3 Championship in 2012 and third place in British F3 championship in 2011 and 2012, he jumped across the pond to Indy Lights, where he was moderately successful with a total of one 2nd and 5 3rd places.

Our driver for the number 29 car is mexican Helio Hernandez. Although he is unexperienced, he seems to have a lot of natural talent and we think that he´s going to be a great driver.

We also want to thank Citroen for their support which was needed for this move. We are truly grateful to be able to use Citroen Racings base in Versailles as our base.

We are also happy to announce that De Friis Motorsport is now a part of Citroen Racings young driver progam, both in rallying and at the track.


Here are liveries:
Hernandez
van der Zwaart
Vepe
 
Posts: 298
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 03:18
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Stramala » 06 Jun 2012, 02:46

Also, Nuppiz, I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but you could always make the tracks into bonafide Rejects of LFS venues by customising the circuit...such as what I've done here;

Image
Image
Image
Image
I O . S O N O . I N T E R I S T A
2015 INDYCAR CHAMPION
2015 REJECTS OF LFS DRIVER & TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 F2RWRS TEAMS & MANUFACTURERS CHAMPION
2015 F1RMGP WEC TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 SUPER TOURING CUP CHAMPION
User avatar
Stramala
 
Posts: 8706
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 19:30

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby pasta_maldonado » 06 Jun 2012, 05:09

kostas22 wrote:Also, Nuppiz, I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but you could always make the tracks into bonafide Rejects of LFS venues by customising the circuit...such as what I've done here;

Image
Image
Image
Image


Il Barone Rampante's version of Fiorano?
Plus One Group - Everyone's favourite motorsports group!

"It's just...you know...basically shite happens" -Juan Pablo Montoya
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
 
Posts: 3686
Joined: 23 Apr 2012, 02:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 06 Jun 2012, 06:57

pasta_maldonado wrote:Good idea kostas, but we don't want to turn this into the Champions League or something. Nuppiz, is there any way you can change the number of cars that can start, perhaps to 25? I don't know how similar LFS is to rFactor, but in rFactor there is a line in the track file that governs how many cars can start a race.

I've looked around on the internet to see if there was a way to expand the grid size, but nope, no options. The old Y18 version from about four years ago had a giltch that allowed grids up to 32 AI cars, but that can't be applied to the current version and I can't find a working download for such an old version either.

I've got a couple of alternative qualifying methods as well, they'll follow in a separate post.

kostas22 wrote:Also, Nuppiz, I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but you could always make the tracks into bonafide Rejects of LFS venues by customising the circuit...such as what I've done here;

Yeah, I could.. but I'm too lazy to be bothered. :P
Vepe wrote:Here are liveries:
Hernandez
van der Zwaart

And here's what it looks like in-game:
Image

As you can see, it's quite fuzzy, which is the result of the image being quite small. If you want it to be better, you should use a bigger size.
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 06 Jun 2012, 08:21

Okay, here's two more ideas for qualifying:

System #3 Similar to my first suggestion, but with a twist. Only the last 10 finishers of the feature race are guaranteed for the sprint race; all other finishers (and non-finishers) have to battle against the non-qualifiers in a special qualifying session, with the 10 fastest drivers getting into the sprint race.

Example: 9 cars automatically fail to qualify for the feature race. The race has 16 finishers and four retirements. Cars from positions 7 to 16 form the first half of the sprint race grid, while all other cars battle for the other half.

System #4 The feature race will take place normally, with the 20 best qualifiers getting in it. However, the sprint race is replaced by a "consolation race", where all non-qualifiers are joined by all who failed to complete at least 90% of the feature race (if the total goes over 20, then only those who retired the earliest are included).

Example 1: 9 cars automatically fail to qualify for the feature race, and are demoted to the "consolation race". The fastest non-qualifier takes the pole position, followed by 2nd for the 22nd qualifier etc.. In the feature race, 6 cars retire; these cars are added to the consolation race, with the car that retired the latest going right behind the non-qualifiers, and the car with the earliest retirement starting last.

Example 2: Like above, but with the feature race having 12 retirements. The car which retired the closest to the end won't take part in the consolation race.

So, which one of these is your favorite? You can now vote for numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4:
1: My original suggestion
2: Kostas' heat system
3: System #3 in this post.
4: System #4 in this post.

New suggestions are still welcome as well.
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Stramala » 06 Jun 2012, 08:24

My vote goes to #2 obviously :P
I O . S O N O . I N T E R I S T A
2015 INDYCAR CHAMPION
2015 REJECTS OF LFS DRIVER & TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 F2RWRS TEAMS & MANUFACTURERS CHAMPION
2015 F1RMGP WEC TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 SUPER TOURING CUP CHAMPION
User avatar
Stramala
 
Posts: 8706
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 19:30

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 06 Jun 2012, 08:45

Also, forgot to mention that because of the forums being down for almost the whole day, Phoenix and Pointrox get extra time in deciding whether or not they want to use Judds. The new deadline is now 22:00 UTC, June 6th, after which The Lukas may decide upon the matter, and Tarantino Autosport may choose their engine freely.
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby This » 06 Jun 2012, 08:51

i'm going for 1 or 4

i would like to get the third update for GTI too, because allmost all teams have now 3 updates. The original idea was 'being so slow that GTI will avoid being involved in crashes' but with that many entrants...
My test-driver is Gio Van Dycke, because Trabant and Cillit Bang! insist. Also can you put additional Moneytron-logos on the rear wing?
www.festivalblog.be
User avatar
This
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: 01 Dec 2009, 05:45
Location: Hasselt, Belgium

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 06 Jun 2012, 09:20

This wrote:i'm going for 1 or 4

i would like to get the third update for GTI too, because allmost all teams have now 3 updates. The original idea was 'being so slow that GTI will avoid being involved in crashes' but with that many entrants...
My test-driver is Gio Van Dycke, because Trabant and Cillit Bang! insist. Also can you put additional Moneytron-logos on the rear wing?

Acknowledged.
Image
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Wizzie » 06 Jun 2012, 11:00

MRT will vote for option 2
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
User avatar
Wizzie
 
Posts: 11850
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 14:42
Location: The OTHER edge of the hole that is Penrith

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby JeremyMcClean » 06 Jun 2012, 11:55

Wizzie wrote:MRT will vote for option 2


#2 is the least confusing. So I will vote for #2 as well.
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.

Trulli bad puns...
#TakiToFerrari
User avatar
JeremyMcClean
 
Posts: 3837
Joined: 23 Aug 2010, 04:58
Location: Nowhere in particular

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby AdrianSutil » 06 Jun 2012, 14:23

I liked the idea of number 2 aswell. But I don't have an entry :lol:

However, what year is this being run in? Does it coincide with the RWRS? If it is, then I might fill the last spot, making the second option easier to manage.
For explanation on recent inactivity, please read 2nd post on 2nd page of 'just nipping out' thread. Thank you.
User avatar
AdrianSutil
 
Posts: 3187
Joined: 08 Jun 2011, 11:21
Location: Folkestone, Kent

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Wizzie » 06 Jun 2012, 15:05

AdrianSutil wrote:I liked the idea of number 2 aswell. But I don't have an entry :lol:

However, what year is this being run in? Does it coincide with the RWRS? If it is, then I might fill the last spot, making the second option easier to manage.


It does indeed run at the same time as the 2015 FORWRS (Which will forever more be the collective term Formula Openwheel Rejects World Race Series to make it easier to group them all) season.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
User avatar
Wizzie
 
Posts: 11850
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 14:42
Location: The OTHER edge of the hole that is Penrith

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby AdrianSutil » 06 Jun 2012, 15:22

In that case, Kingfisher will take the 30th and final spot with F1RWRS test-driver Matthias Valsattis taking the sole entry (which keeps him busy).

Someone please run by me the entry process as I'm honestly too damn lazy to find out myself :lol:
For explanation on recent inactivity, please read 2nd post on 2nd page of 'just nipping out' thread. Thank you.
User avatar
AdrianSutil
 
Posts: 3187
Joined: 08 Jun 2011, 11:21
Location: Folkestone, Kent

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby pasta_maldonado » 06 Jun 2012, 17:56

I vote for number 3 :)
Plus One Group - Everyone's favourite motorsports group!

"It's just...you know...basically shite happens" -Juan Pablo Montoya
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
 
Posts: 3686
Joined: 23 Apr 2012, 02:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Stramala » 06 Jun 2012, 18:15

All this talk of numbers reminds me of this
I O . S O N O . I N T E R I S T A
2015 INDYCAR CHAMPION
2015 REJECTS OF LFS DRIVER & TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 F2RWRS TEAMS & MANUFACTURERS CHAMPION
2015 F1RMGP WEC TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 SUPER TOURING CUP CHAMPION
User avatar
Stramala
 
Posts: 8706
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 19:30

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 06 Jun 2012, 18:24

AdrianSutil wrote:In that case, Kingfisher will take the 30th and final spot with F1RWRS test-driver Matthias Valsattis taking the sole entry (which keeps him busy).

Someone please run by me the entry process as I'm honestly too damn lazy to find out myself :lol:


Kingfisher Racing (AdrianSutil)
#30: Matthias Valsattis (M) (LAT)
Current credits: 75 (bonus from Valsattis' previous experience)
Engine: ? (you still need to wait to find out if you're going to get a Zytek or a Judd, but you can already choose what you want to rebadge it).
Added Mass: 50 kg
Tyres: ? (Pirelli or Dunlop)

And with that, Ural Racing (The Lukas) now has the clock ticking for their privilege to replace their Zyteks with Judds. Their deadline is on 08:30 UTC, June 9th. Tarantino Autosport may now choose their engines freely.
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby pasta_maldonado » 06 Jun 2012, 18:30

kostas22 wrote:All this talk of numbers reminds me of this

Reminds me of this
Plus One Group - Everyone's favourite motorsports group!

"It's just...you know...basically shite happens" -Juan Pablo Montoya
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
 
Posts: 3686
Joined: 23 Apr 2012, 02:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Stramala » 06 Jun 2012, 18:50

pasta_maldonado wrote:
kostas22 wrote:All this talk of numbers reminds me of this

Reminds me of this

Which in turn reminds me of this.
I O . S O N O . I N T E R I S T A
2015 INDYCAR CHAMPION
2015 REJECTS OF LFS DRIVER & TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 F2RWRS TEAMS & MANUFACTURERS CHAMPION
2015 F1RMGP WEC TEAMS CHAMPION
2015 SUPER TOURING CUP CHAMPION
User avatar
Stramala
 
Posts: 8706
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 19:30

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Ataxia » 06 Jun 2012, 19:24

kostas22 wrote:
pasta_maldonado wrote:
kostas22 wrote:All this talk of numbers reminds me of this

Reminds me of this

Which in turn reminds me of this.


I only watch Countdown for Rachel Riley... :lol:
F1RDS - Bringing fresh blood to RWRS since 2015.

F1 Rejects' resident grump/grouch.
User avatar
Ataxia
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: 23 Jun 2010, 22:47
Location: Breathing in the chemicals (AHHHH!)

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Vepe » 06 Jun 2012, 19:59

Nuppiz wrote:As you can see, it's quite fuzzy, which is the result of the image being quite small. If you want it to be better, you should use a bigger size.


No, I´m fine with that. Meaning too lazy to redo them.
Vepe
 
Posts: 298
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 03:18
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby dr-baker » 06 Jun 2012, 20:55

pasta_maldonado wrote:
kostas22 wrote:All this talk of numbers reminds me of this

Reminds me of this

[/quote]
That Countdown was so easy:

100((7+6+1)/2)
As hardcore as a peach...

West Cliff Results 2015
F1RM WEC: 1st (drivers)/2nd (teams)
F3RWRS: 3rd (drivers)/3rd (teams)
Whoop whoop.
User avatar
dr-baker
 
Posts: 8284
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:30
Location: at my laptop

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby The Lukas » 06 Jun 2012, 23:17

Ural Racing replace thier Zytek engine on Judd engines
The Lukas
 
Posts: 320
Joined: 05 Jul 2011, 04:21

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Shadaza » 06 Jun 2012, 23:38

I will vote for Kostas's heat system as it reminds me the most of my Karting days!

Apologies If I do not post so much in the thread as time is really hard to find at the moment!
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:
takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?


Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
User avatar
Shadaza
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: 06 Jun 2009, 09:49

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby Nuppiz » 07 Jun 2012, 01:10

The Lukas wrote:Ural Racing replace thier Zytek engine on Judd engines

Alright, that means that as soon as the deadline for Phoenix's and Pointrox's first preference over the Judd engines ends, all remaining teams may choose whichever engine they want (both manufacturers still have two slots open).
Shadaza wrote:I will vote for Kostas's heat system as it reminds me the most of my Karting days!

Apologies If I do not post so much in the thread as time is really hard to find at the moment!

No worries, as long as you decide all the important things, I don't mind at all how much you post!

Curiously enough, only the preparation for this season has taken about the same amount of posts as the previous season altogether!
PMMF Moderator, keeping that subforum tidy since 21st April 2013.

IFRC: not related to the charity foundation at all.
Life GP Series: where reliability is little more than a fancy word.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Moderator
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 22:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Rejects of LFS: yet another offline racing series!

Postby pasta_maldonado » 07 Jun 2012, 01:37

Nuppiz wrote:
The Lukas wrote:Ural Racing replace thier Zytek engine on Judd engines

Alright, that means that as soon as the deadline for Phoenix's and Pointrox's first preference over the Judd engines ends, all remaining teams may choose whichever engine they want (both manufacturers still have two slots open).
Shadaza wrote:I will vote for Kostas's heat system as it reminds me the most of my Karting days!

Apologies If I do not post so much in the thread as time is really hard to find at the moment!

No worries, as long as you decide all the important things, I don't mind at all how much you post!

Curiously enough, only the preparation for this season has taken about the same amount of posts as the previous season altogether!


It's going to be a season of 1982 proporttions....
Plus One Group - Everyone's favourite motorsports group!

"It's just...you know...basically shite happens" -Juan Pablo Montoya
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
 
Posts: 3686
Joined: 23 Apr 2012, 02:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

PreviousNext

Return to The "Flat Out, Flat Broke" Memorial Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests