Yannick wrote:How did Michel Vaillant not manage to win any GPs between the French GP of 83 (Castellet) and the French GP of 93 (Magny-Cours)? Did he race for Ligier during that time or was he in Group C?
AussieGrit wrote:At a VIP dinner last night an American woman asked me"where are you from?" I said Australia, she said "wow your English is amazing"
tommykl wrote:Yannick wrote:How did Michel Vaillant not manage to win any GPs between the French GP of 83 (Castellet) and the French GP of 93 (Magny-Cours)? Did he race for Ligier during that time or was he in Group C?
There was no comics concentrating on F1 during that time![]()
It was mostly Le Mans (because he obviously has to race in just about every race series at the sam time) with some truck racing (yes, truck racing) mixed in.
Faustus wrote:tommykl wrote:Yannick wrote:How did Michel Vaillant not manage to win any GPs between the French GP of 83 (Castellet) and the French GP of 93 (Magny-Cours)? Did he race for Ligier during that time or was he in Group C?
There was no comics concentrating on F1 during that time![]()
It was mostly Le Mans (because he obviously has to race in just about every race series at the sam time) with some truck racing (yes, truck racing) mixed in.
I've started buying the albums again, from the Amazon.fr. Do you know if all 70 have been reprinted?
AussieGrit wrote:At a VIP dinner last night an American woman asked me"where are you from?" I said Australia, she said "wow your English is amazing"
Howard A Treesong wrote:Anyone seen 'Mask of Dust', only found out about it recently but there were a number of cameos including Stirling Moss, Reg Parnell and others.
Worst film has to be 'Driven'. But what do you expect from something written, produced and starring Sylvester Stallone? It's just awful, apart from being utter bollocks (like the bit where they drive Indycars flat out through the traffic of LA) it utterly trivialises very serious accidents. The slightest impact at any speed and cars are hurled into the air on fire and burst apart like wet cardboard. It's awful because people have died in crashes like those, but we are supposed to laugh.
dnhrudi wrote:Howard A Treesong wrote:Anyone seen 'Mask of Dust', only found out about it recently but there were a number of cameos including Stirling Moss, Reg Parnell and others.
Worst film has to be 'Driven'. But what do you expect from something written, produced and starring Sylvester Stallone? It's just awful, apart from being utter bollocks (like the bit where they drive Indycars flat out through the traffic of LA) it utterly trivialises very serious accidents. The slightest impact at any speed and cars are hurled into the air on fire and burst apart like wet cardboard. It's awful because people have died in crashes like those, but we are supposed to laugh.
To be fair Stallone is an Oscar winning script writer, but yes Driven is absolute crap, made worse by the years of expectation that he might be doing something halfway decent
nome66 wrote:i just saw Senna last night. it was beautiful.
they did kinda portray prost as a bad guy, but overall very well put together, i personally dig the music for the '84 monaco scene!
it also wasn't as much of a tear jerker as i thought it would be, probably because i knew it had to end in san marino. i like when they showed how the championship boiled down to japan two years in a row. it really did happen that way!
redbulljack14 wrote:nome66 wrote:i just saw Senna last night. it was beautiful.
they did kinda portray prost as a bad guy, but overall very well put together, i personally dig the music for the '84 monaco scene!
it also wasn't as much of a tear jerker as i thought it would be, probably because i knew it had to end in san marino. i like when they showed how the championship boiled down to japan two years in a row. it really did happen that way!
They did make Prost seem like a bad guy, which I didn't like, and there should have been a good portion of the film featuring Berger, as he and Senna were so close.
nome66 wrote:they also left out the Indycar testing footage with Emmo.
maybe there will be an extended version sometime but whatever i say it's fine the way it is these are just observations from my standpoint
kostas22 wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
eagleash wrote:In the recent Motor Sport Podcast with Murray Walker the opinion was expressed by at least one participant that "Closer to the Edge" was better than the Senna movie. Haven't seen either so can't comment.
kostas22 wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
eagleash wrote:Not a film as such but this is a favourite YouTube clip of mine.....
(Think it must have been filmed in the sixties, judging by the cars seen in the background).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zaM-KbX ... re=related
Faustus wrote:nome66 wrote:they also left out the Indycar testing footage with Emmo.
maybe there will be an extended version sometime but whatever i say it's fine the way it is these are just observations from my standpoint
I've watched the extended version and the Indycar test isn't in it. The extended version that is available at the moment just incorporates footage from some of the interviews that the producers carried out into the relevant point in the narrative of the film.
Maybe there will be an extra-extended version with more footage added, because I would love to see the 6 hour rough cut.
mario wrote:...but Senna himself thought that rally driving was far too risky to contemplate. http://www.racecar-engineering.com/arti ... ly-driver/
kostas22 wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
Wallio wrote:Does Street Racing Count? If so, American Graffiti hands down.
nome66 wrote:well in that case my favorite street racing films are The Fast and The Furious(2001)
and also Fast and Furious which is the fourth movie in that series. i don't know why they had that title either.
comments on the other ones in the series:
2Fast 2Furious(2002) was laughable. had one good night race scene toward the middle of the film. Eva Mendes was ok in this one.
The Fast and The Furious-Tokyo Drift(2006) had nothing to do with the original story. Bow Wow was completely useless.
Fast Five(2011) was alright, but the Rock(Duane Johnson) was not very good. final chase scene was epic, though.
just my opinions. you guys probably don't care.
nome66 wrote:a plot hole i found between sequels is that Han from Tokyo Drift said in the 4th movie (which based on Han i assume it's a prequel to #3) "i hear there's some crazy [stuff] in tokyo. maybe i'll head out there"
and any viewer who's seen the 3rd film will assume "that's the last we'll see of him forever", but in Fast Five he's there throughout the entire movie! whaaatt?
we assume that's the only reason they're making a 6th one, so he finally disappears to patch up that little hole in time.
Me and a bunch of other avid movie-goers saw Fast Five in theatres and audibly muttered "wait, what?"
wmetcalf68 wrote:I actually liked Driven!
dr-baker wrote:wmetcalf68 wrote:I actually liked Driven!
Oh.
My.
Goodness!
![]()
AndreaModa wrote:dr-baker wrote:wmetcalf68 wrote:I actually liked Driven!
Oh.
My.
Goodness!
![]()
It's all right, he's only got Cars, Snow White and the Lion King to compare it to!
ibsey wrote:I quite like Driven too. I found as long as you don't take the film too seriously, it can be a bit of a giggle (as IIRC the main site article on it suggested). Also because it had Estella Warren in it... let's just say she makes certain parts of my anatomy grow!!!![]()
Has Cars 2 been talked about yet? I've only seen Cars 1 & also quite liked that.
dr-baker wrote:Let me guess - it made you big-headed?
Return to The Eric van de Poele Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests