WeirdKerr wrote:What if Kobayashi and Massa swapped places at the Beginning of this year.....?
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.
JeremyMcClean wrote:WeirdKerr wrote:What if Kobayashi and Massa swapped places at the Beginning of this year.....?
Kobayashi would have definetly scored a podium by now. A win? Maybe not, as he would still be #2, but he would be way more competitive than Massa.
Massa in Sauber doesn't go very well and gets sacked after Hungary. Oddly enough, Heidfeld gets a seat for Sauber once again (seeing how he got sacked from Renault), and both fade into obscurity...
AdrianSutil wrote:Surely Pierluigi Martini and Minardi are close to the record?
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.
shinji wrote:What if Timo Glock had 'accidentally' slid in to Hamilton as he passed him at Brazil last year?
wmetcalf68 wrote:What if Schumi didn't hit Villeneuve at Jerez?
JeremyMcClean wrote:What if Nico Hulkenburg stayed at Williams?
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:What if Enzo Ferrari had taken John Surtee's advice and signed on Ayrton Senna for 1985?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Wizzie wrote:What if Enzo Ferrari had taken John Surtee's advice and signed on Ayrton Senna for 1985?
I'd imagine Senna would've won a few races, perhaps a few more than with Lotus, challenged certainly for the 1985 title, but I doubt he would've won any. Probably would leave Ferrari to go to McLaren for 1988, and the rest we know. Nelson Piquet probably goes to Ferrari instead of Lotus in 1988, but winds up at Benetton anyway, possibly a year or two earlier. Michele Alboreto retires sooner, and, having never had a shot at the title, is occasionally named as someone who could've won one.
Meanwhile, at Lotus, they are less successful without Ayrton Senna, but are still competitive with Elio de Angelis, preventing him from going to Brabham and dying in testing. He probably gets picked up by Williams after 1987, and is forced to be Mansell's lackey in '91 and '92. After then he is cut loose and spends a few years going down the grid before retiring. Alternatively, he refuses to play along in 1991 and Williams hangs on to Boutsen instead, and de Angelis replaces Nannini at Benetton. de Angelis performs well against Piquet, and the team opts to keep de Angelis for 1992 and put a young Michael Schumacher alongside him. de Angelis proves to be Schumacher's toughest teammate, but cannot beat Schumacher, although he wins about 10-12 more races and Benetton wins the Constructors' title in 1994 instead of Williams. He retires not long after 1995.
Following de Angelis' departure, Lotus falls apart without a good driver and goes under a couple years sooner, in 1992 or 1993. Johnny Herbert is never able to prove his talent.
Me too!wmetcalf68 wrote:shinji wrote:What if Timo Glock had 'accidentally' slid in to Hamilton as he passed him at Brazil last year?
I would be happy!
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Wizzie wrote:What if Enzo Ferrari had taken John Surtee's advice and signed on Ayrton Senna for 1985?
I'd imagine Senna would've won a few races, perhaps a few more than with Lotus, challenged certainly for the 1985 title, but I doubt he would've won any. Probably would leave Ferrari to go to McLaren for 1988, and the rest we know. Nelson Piquet probably goes to Ferrari instead of Lotus in 1988, but winds up at Benetton anyway, possibly a year or two earlier. Michele Alboreto retires sooner, and, having never had a shot at the title, is occasionally named as someone who could've won one.
Meanwhile, at Lotus, they are less successful without Ayrton Senna, but are still competitive with Elio de Angelis, preventing him from going to Brabham and dying in testing. He probably gets picked up by Williams after 1987, and is forced to be Mansell's lackey in '91 and '92. After then he is cut loose and spends a few years going down the grid before retiring. Alternatively, he refuses to play along in 1991 and Williams hangs on to Boutsen instead, and de Angelis replaces Nannini at Benetton. de Angelis performs well against Piquet, and the team opts to keep de Angelis for 1992 and put a young Michael Schumacher alongside him. de Angelis proves to be Schumacher's toughest teammate, but cannot beat Schumacher, although he wins about 10-12 more races and Benetton wins the Constructors' title in 1994 instead of Williams. He retires not long after 1995.
Following de Angelis' departure, Lotus falls apart without a good driver and goes under a couple years sooner, in 1992 or 1993. Johnny Herbert is never able to prove his talent.
AussieGrit wrote:At a VIP dinner last night an American woman asked me"where are you from?" I said Australia, she said "wow your English is amazing"
tommykl wrote:BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Wizzie wrote:What if Enzo Ferrari had taken John Surtee's advice and signed on Ayrton Senna for 1985?
I'd imagine Senna would've won a few races, perhaps a few more than with Lotus, challenged certainly for the 1985 title, but I doubt he would've won any. Probably would leave Ferrari to go to McLaren for 1988, and the rest we know. Nelson Piquet probably goes to Ferrari instead of Lotus in 1988, but winds up at Benetton anyway, possibly a year or two earlier. Michele Alboreto retires sooner, and, having never had a shot at the title, is occasionally named as someone who could've won one.
Meanwhile, at Lotus, they are less successful without Ayrton Senna, but are still competitive with Elio de Angelis, preventing him from going to Brabham and dying in testing. He probably gets picked up by Williams after 1987, and is forced to be Mansell's lackey in '91 and '92. After then he is cut loose and spends a few years going down the grid before retiring. Alternatively, he refuses to play along in 1991 and Williams hangs on to Boutsen instead, and de Angelis replaces Nannini at Benetton. de Angelis performs well against Piquet, and the team opts to keep de Angelis for 1992 and put a young Michael Schumacher alongside him. de Angelis proves to be Schumacher's toughest teammate, but cannot beat Schumacher, although he wins about 10-12 more races and Benetton wins the Constructors' title in 1994 instead of Williams. He retires not long after 1995.
Following de Angelis' departure, Lotus falls apart without a good driver and goes under a couple years sooner, in 1992 or 1993. Johnny Herbert is never able to prove his talent.
You forgot that de Angelis would probably be the most experienced driver of all-time at his retirement.
redbulljack14 wrote:Yeah, Panis a genuine championship contender at one point in 1997. Imagine if he had won the championship.
Stramala [kostas22] wrote:Giedo van der Garde - We expected crap from him, he has delivered crap so far. Well done on matching our expectations lad.
Shizuka wrote:An interesting question, not by me though:redbulljack14 wrote:Yeah, Panis a genuine championship contender at one point in 1997. Imagine if he had won the championship.
Shizuka wrote:An interesting question, not by me though:redbulljack14 wrote:Yeah, Panis a genuine championship contender at one point in 1997. Imagine if he had won the championship.
dinizintheoven wrote:Can I just further ask about two points:
(1) With Alex Zanardi staying in CART, hence competing in the 2001 season, though probably not with Mo Nunn, does he still have that crash?
(2) With Jenson Button starting his career at Minardi, was there a shootout between him and Bruno Junqueira to see who kept that seat warm while waiting for a proper go at Williams?
dinizintheoven wrote:Can I just further ask about two points:
(1) With Alex Zanardi staying in CART, hence competing in the 2001 season, though probably not with Mo Nunn, does he still have that crash?
(2) With Jenson Button starting his career at Minardi, was there a shootout between him and Bruno Junqueira to see who kept that seat warm while waiting for a proper go at Williams?
Vepe wrote:I also have a question: What is the performance of McLaren in 2003 ?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Vepe wrote:I also have a question: What is the performance of McLaren in 2003 ?
Pretty much the same. They start well, with Coulthard and Raikkonen winning in Australia and Malaysia, but tail off after that. Raikkonen stays in the title hunt, but Panis' success means he is more of an outside shot for the title than in real life.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
David AGS wrote:What if Bertrand Gachot did not spray CS gas in a London Taxi, where would he have ended up in 1992, still at Larousse, Jordan or somewhere else?
What would have happened if BMW said to Seb. Vettel you cannot join a rival team under any circumstances. Where woukd the likes of Kubica or Heidfeld would be, and would Red Bull be winning as many races as they are now?
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.
David AGS wrote:What would have happened if Pierluigi Martini won in Australia 1989? He was fastest in warm-up by a big margin according to Forza Minardi before the rain came, to add to that what would have happed if Jos The Boss stayed on track in Brazil 2003?
Wizzie wrote:BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Vepe wrote:I also have a question: What is the performance of McLaren in 2003 ?
Pretty much the same. They start well, with Coulthard and Raikkonen winning in Australia and Malaysia, but tail off after that. Raikkonen stays in the title hunt, but Panis' success means he is more of an outside shot for the title than in real life.
Will McLaren still fail epically at getting the MP4/18 ready?
JeremyMcClean wrote:David AGS wrote:What if Bertrand Gachot did not spray CS gas in a London Taxi, where would he have ended up in 1992, still at Larousse, Jordan or somewhere else?
What would have happened if BMW said to Seb. Vettel you cannot join a rival team under any circumstances. Where woukd the likes of Kubica or Heidfeld would be, and would Red Bull be winning as many races as they are now?
Gachot would still have been at Larrousse in 1992. But he would have finished the year off with Jordan. Which means Michael Schumacher doesn't get to start with them in Belgium. Which means that he doesn't have the career he has, etc. I could go on but I might leave that up to Jeroen Krautmeir to do another one of those Flash Fiction stories. (Once he completes his first one, that is.)
For BMW, Timo Glock gets the start. Vettel still replaces Scott Speed, though later in the season.
mario wrote:JeremyMcClean wrote:David AGS wrote:What if Bertrand Gachot did not spray CS gas in a London Taxi, where would he have ended up in 1992, still at Larousse, Jordan or somewhere else?
Gachot would still have been at Larrousse in 1992. But he would have finished the year off with Jordan. Which means Michael Schumacher doesn't get to start with them in Belgium. Which means that he doesn't have the career he has, etc. I could go on but I might leave that up to Jeroen Krautmeir to do another one of those Flash Fiction stories. (Once he completes his first one, that is.)
For BMW, Timo Glock gets the start. Vettel still replaces Scott Speed, though later in the season.
IIRC, there was one poster who pointed out that relations between Eddie Jordan and Bertrand Gachot were already strained and that Jordan wasn't exactly unhappy to see Gachot go, so he might well have been on his way out of the team before the end of the season anyway. As for what might happen to Schumacher, you would have to assume that he would have driven for Sauber thanks to the Mercedes deal - Mercedes did have a contract which could have forced Schumacher to drive for Sauber (they could place him at a customer team of theirs), but they decided not to force the issue.
kostas22 wrote:What if Badoer hadn't crashed into Villeneuve at Monaco 1996?
AussieGrit wrote:At a VIP dinner last night an American woman asked me"where are you from?" I said Australia, she said "wow your English is amazing"
And get Gachot kicked out by Schumacher after all? That would be funnydr-baker wrote:If Schumacher did not debut for Jordan, and Sauber chose not to have Schumacher in favour of the drivers they originally chose, could Schumacher have debuted for Pacific in exchange for free Ilmor engines?
tommykl wrote:kostas22 wrote:What if Badoer hadn't crashed into Villeneuve at Monaco 1996?
Assuming Badoer kept it on the track until the end of the race, he would score his and Forti's first points, Forti would probably continue long enough for the new car to show potential, but they don't make it to 1997.
We all celebrate Brett Lunger as the driver to start the most races without scoring a single point.
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.
JeremyMcClean wrote:tommykl wrote:kostas22 wrote:What if Badoer hadn't crashed into Villeneuve at Monaco 1996?
Assuming Badoer kept it on the track until the end of the race, he would score his and Forti's first points, Forti would probably continue long enough for the new car to show potential, but they don't make it to 1997.
We all celebrate Brett Lunger as the driver to start the most races without scoring a single point.
...and his gearbox failure in Europe 1999 isn't as saddening.
AdrianSutil wrote:Sorry to burst your bubble here, but the final classification had Salo and Hakkinen 5 laps down in 5th and 6th. Badoer was already 6 laps behind Panis when he hit Villeneuve, so wouldn't have scored anyway. It's a popular myth saying Badoer would've scored points, but sadly he wouldn't.
Klon wrote:AdrianSutil wrote:Sorry to burst your bubble here, but the final classification had Salo and Hakkinen 5 laps down in 5th and 6th. Badoer was already 6 laps behind Panis when he hit Villeneuve, so wouldn't have scored anyway. It's a popular myth saying Badoer would've scored points, but sadly he wouldn't.
That would imply that Badoer couldn't have gotten a lap back to take these points...
Yes, he could have. Shut up, if we continue to tell us it is so, it will become true!
Return to The Eric van de Poele Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests